Evolution

A Horse is a Horse, of Course, of Course…

All Science proves that life reproduces after its own kind as foretold in the Bible. A horse is a horse.

Roses produce roses. Sharks produce sharks. And horses produce horses, or “Equidae,” which is the scientific name for the horse family. Equidae includes horses, mules, donkeys, and zebra. In the Bible, God assures us we can know he is God because he, and no one else, tells us the future with 100% accuracy.

…I am God, and there is none like me. I make known the end from the beginning… ~ Isaiah 46:9-10

The Bible is loaded with detailed prophecies that always come true to the letter. But we see hints of God’s knowledge of the future in more subtle ways as well. It starts in the very first chapter of the very first book of the Bible. In Genesis 1, God clearly lays the ground work to counter the ridiculously laughable fairy tale of evolution, which would be popularized thousands of years later by zero evidence and lots of name calling and peer pressure. In the Creation account of Genesis 1, God repeats over and over that living things were created, and reproduce, according to their kinds. In other words, God set these “kinds” in place. They never evolve into, or out of, another “kind.” The fossil record backs this up 100%. An Equidae will never produce anything but an Equidae.

Then God said, “Let the earth bring forth grass, the herb that yields seed, and the fruit tree that yields fruit according to its kind, whose seed is in itself, on the earth”; and it was so. And the earth brought forth grass, the herb that yields seed according to its kind, and the tree that yields fruit, whose seed is in itself according to its kind. And God saw that it was good. So the evening and the morning were the third day. ~ Genesis 1:11-13 NKJV

Then God said, “Let the earth bring forth the living creature according to its kind: cattle and creeping thing and beast of the earth, each according to its kind “; and it was so. And God made the beast of the earth according to its kind, cattle according to its kind, and everything that creeps on the earth according to its kind. And God saw that it was good. ~ Genesis 1:24-25 NKJV

So, God rebuts evolution thousands of years before evolution is popularized.

But doesn’t science prove evolution? No, exactly the opposite. To the amazement of everyone I speak with who starts a conversation by mocking Creationists, the fossil record backs up Creation 100%, and disproves evolution 100%. I haven’t yet met a defender of Darwin’s book, “The Origin of the Species,” who has actually ever read it! This is why I mentioned that evolution is supported only by name calling and peer pressure. All science points 180° away from evolution.

The fact is, the fossil record shows that all “kinds” appeared suddenly, and out of no where, in the Cambrian fossil layer. The fossil record shows no evolution whatsoever. Darwin himself discovered this.

“Geology assuredly DOES NOT reveal any such finely-graduated organic chain; and this, perhaps, is the most obvious and serious objection which can be urged against the theory [of evolution].” ~Charles Darwin

“The case at present must remain inexplicable; and may be truly urged as a valid argument against the views here entertained.” ~ Charles Darwin

“To the question why we do not find records of these vast primordial periods, I can give no satisfactory answer.” ~ Charles Darwin

Darwin theorized there would be innumerable intermediate species, or “missing links,” between the actual kinds of lifeforms we see today. This means that finding a fossil that looks anything like its modern cousin among the “innumerable” millions of intermediate links would be like hitting the Powerball. Well, Creationists have hit the Powerball tens of millions of times in a row over the past 150+ years, and evolutionists have hit it zero times. To this day, not a single one of the “innumerable” missing links has ever been found. However, name calling and peer pressure work tirelessly to suppress science and facts:

Bill Maher

But getting back to the repeated theme in Genesis 1, that species are set and reproduce “according to their kind,” let’s look at some photographic evidence:

horses reproduce horses

Mommy horse and baby horse running. The baby horse looks suspiciously like a…well…uh…horse. A living thing will always reproduce “according to its kind.” A horse will never give birth to a flounder, or a tomato plant. Similarly, and this may be shocking considering what’s taught in “science” class nowadays, tomato plants and flounders don’t give birth to horses. (Image Source: babyhorse.org)

cute baby horse with mom

Another baby horse that looks like a horse. Certainly, this baby horse was born with wings, or a beak, or some other evolutionary marvel that was Photoshopped out by an evil Creationist (said with sinister music playing in the background). (Image Source: babyhorse.org)

cute baby horse resting on mom

Awww, this is so cute! Too cute to be real if you ask me! Clearly, some science-hating wacko from the Christian Right cropped the gills, or the scales, or the webbed-toes from this baby “horse.” (Image Source: babyhorse.org)

Well, I’m certainly not going to let the anti-science propaganda in these photos go unanswered. Below is a video in which a horse has clearly evolved the ability to speak. Please let your friends and relatives know! Spread the word! We will NOT let the anti-science Creationists suppress this evidence!!!

5 replies »

  1. Good post. You’re right, God discredited the theory of evolution from the beginning of time.

    I think it is also worth noting the order in which things happened: the plants appeared first, before the sun was created. Evolution says they evolved the capability of photosynthesis in response to exposure to sunlight.

    Wrong.

    Also, earth was made before the sun, the moon, and all of the stars. Evolutionary theory — supported by the science guild — says that stars exploded, throwing the elements all across the galaxy, giving birth to our solar system and eventually the Earth itself. This is obviously in conflict with the Biblical account of Creation.

    That’s not to say that stars don’t explode and distribute elements across the galaxy. But it does mean that it’s not how all things were created.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s